Frequently Asked Questions
- What is this case about?
- What Are Lead Plaintiffs’ Reasons for The Settlement?
- Who Is Included in The Settlement Class?
- Why Did I Get The Notice?
- How Are Settlement Class Members Affected by the Action and The Settlement?
- How Do I Participate in The Settlement?
- How Much Will My Payment Be?
- What Payment Are the Attorneys for The Settlement Class Seeking? How Will the Lawyers Be Paid?
- What If I Do Not Want to Be a Member of The Settlement Class? How Do I Exclude Myself?
- If I exclude myself, can I still get payment from the Settlement?
- Do I have a lawyer in this case?
- When And Where Will the Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement?
- Do I Have to Come To The Hearing?
- May I Speak at The Hearing If I Don’t Like The Settlement?
- What If I Bought Shares On Someone Else’s Behalf?
- Can I See the Court File? Whom Should I Contact If I Have Questions?
-
What is this case about?
Beginning on June 21, 2019, two class action complaints were filed in the Court. Another class action was subsequently filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, and it was later transferred to this Court. By Order dated April 14, 2020, these three actions were consolidated and recaptioned as In re Eros International Plc Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 19-cv-14125 (JMV)(JAD) and Lead Plaintiffs, Lead Counsel, and liaison counsel were approved and appointed by the Court.
On July 1, 2020, Lead Plaintiffs filed and served their Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Consolidated Complaint”) asserting claims against defendants Eros, Lulla, Parameswaran, and Deshpande under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and against Lulla, Parameswaran, and Deshpande under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Among other things, the Consolidated Complaint alleged that Eros and the individual defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and failed to disclose material adverse facts, about (a) Eros’s intangible content asset balances, its liquidity and financial condition, and (b) the adequacy of Eros’s internal controls and compliance policies. The Consolidated Complaint further alleged that the price of Eros’s publicly-traded securities was artificially inflated as a result of Defendants’ allegedly false and misleading statements, and declined when the truth was revealed.
On August 28, 2020, defendants Eros, Lulla, and Parameswaran filed and served a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint. On October 14, 2020, Lead Plaintiffs filed and served their papers in opposition, as well as a motion to strike. On November 2, 2020, Eros and individual defendants Lulla and Parameswaran filed and served their papers in opposition to Lead Plaintiffs motion to strike, and on November 9, 2020, Lead Plaintiffs filed and served their reply in support of their motion to strike. On November 13, 2020, Eros and individual defendants Lulla and Parameswaran filed and served their reply papers in further support of their motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint.
On April 20, 2021, the Court entered an order that granted in part, and denied in part, the motion to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint. The order further granted Lead Plaintiffs time to file an amended complaint.
On June 4, 2021, Lead Plaintiffs filed and served the Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Amended Consolidated Complaint”). The Amended Consolidated Complaint, like the Consolidated Complaint, asserted claims against Eros, Lulla, Parameswaran, and Deshpande under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and against the Lulla, Parameswaran, and Deshpande under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Amended Consolidated Complaint alleged claims substantially similar to those alleged in the Consolidated Complaint.
Prior to filing a motion to dismiss the Amended Consolidated Complaint, and in response to then recent news announced by Eros that Lead Plaintiffs believed was relevant to their claims, on October 29, 2021, Lead Plaintiffs served their [Proposed] Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, and defendants Eros, Kishore, Lulla, and Parameswaran stipulated to its filing. On November 5, 2021, Lead Plaintiffs filed and served the Third Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”). The Complaint asserted claims against Eros, the Individual Defendants, and defendant Deshpande under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and against the Individual Defendants and defendant Deshpande under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Complaint alleged claims substantially similar to those alleged in the Amended Consolidated Complaint. But it also included allegations based on new information about Eros’s fiscal year 2020 revenue and related receivables announced by Eros after the filing of the Amended Consolidated Complaint.
On March 4, 2022, Defendants filed and served their motions to dismiss the Complaint. On April 15, 2022, Lead Plaintiffs filed and served their papers in opposition to these motions and, on April 29, 2022, Defendants filed and served their reply papers.
While Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint was pending, Lead Plaintiffs continued their investigation into the claims asserted, but also recognized that the Court’s earlier decision on the motion to dismiss underscored the risks attendant to this litigation. While the Parties believe in the merits of their respective positions, they also recognized the benefits that would accrue if they could reach an agreement to resolve the Action. They began to discuss the possibility of exploring whether a settlement could be reached through a mediation process. The Parties selected David Murphy, Esq., to mediate the Action. In advance of the mediation, the Parties exchanged and provided to Mr. Murphy detailed mediation statements and exhibits that addressed the issues of liability and damages. On November 30, 2022, the Parties participated in a full-day mediation session. The session ended without any agreement being reached.
Over the next several weeks, Mr. Murphy conducted further discussions with the Parties, which culminated in the Parties accepting Mr. Murphy’s recommendation that the Action be settled for $25,000,000.
Based on the investigation and mediation of the case and Lead Plaintiffs’ direct oversight of the prosecution of this matter and with the advice of their counsel, each of the Lead Plaintiffs has agreed to settle and release the claims raised in the Action pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, after considering, among other things, (a) the substantial financial benefit that Lead Plaintiffs and the other members of the Settlement Class will receive under the proposed Settlement; and (b) the significant risks and costs of continued litigation and trial.
Defendants are entering into the Settlement to eliminate the uncertainty, burden, and expense of further protracted litigation. Each of the Defendants denies any wrongdoing, and the Settlement shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of or an admission or concession on the part of any of the Defendants, or any other of the Defendants’ Releasees (defined in paragraph 34 of the Notice), with respect to any claim or allegation of any fault, liability, wrongdoing, or damage whatsoever, or any infirmity in the defenses that the Defendants have, or could have, asserted. Similarly, the Settlement shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of or an admission or concession on the part of any Lead Plaintiff of any infirmity in any of the claims asserted in the Action, or an admission or concession that any of the Defendants’ defenses to liability had any merit.
On July 12, 2023, the Court preliminarily approved the Settlement, authorized the Notice to be disseminated to potential Settlement Class Members, and scheduled the Settlement Hearing to consider whether to grant final approval to the Settlement.
Back To Top -
What Are Lead Plaintiffs’ Reasons for The Settlement?
Lead Plaintiffs’ principal reason for entering into the Settlement is the substantial immediate cash benefit for the Settlement Class without the risk or the delays inherent in further litigation. Moreover, the substantial cash benefit provided under the Settlement must be considered against the significant risk that a smaller recovery – or indeed no recovery at all – might be achieved after contested motions, a trial of the Action, and the likely appeals that would follow a trial. This process could be expected to last several years. Defendants, who deny all allegations of wrongdoing or liability whatsoever, are entering into the Settlement to eliminate the uncertainty, burden, and expense of further protracted litigation.
Back To Top -
Who Is Included in The Settlement Class?
If you are a member of the Settlement Class, you are subject to the Settlement unless you timely requested to be excluded. The Settlement Class consists of:
All persons and entities who or which purchased or otherwise acquired Eros Media World Plc, f/k/a ErosSTX Global Corporation, f/k/a Eros International Plc (“Eros”) class A ordinary shares (New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”): EROS) and/or ErosSTX common stock (NYSE: ESGC) during the period between July 28, 2017 and August 3, 2021, inclusive, and were damaged thereby.
Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants and defendant Deshpande; members of the Immediate Family of each of the Individual Defendants and defendant Deshpande; any trust of which any Individual Defendant or defendant Deshpande is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Individual Defendant or defendant Deshpande and/or member(s) of his or her Immediate Family members; STX; the Officers and/or directors of Eros and/or STX Entertainment f/k/a ErosSTX Global Corporation; any person, firm, trust, corporation, Officer, director or other individual or entity in which any Defendant, defendant Deshpande, or STX has a controlling interest or which is related to or affiliated with any of the Defendants, defendant Deshpande, or STX; and the legal representatives, agents, affiliates, heirs, successors-in-interest, or assigns of any such excluded party.
Also excluded from the Settlement Class are the judges, justices, magistrates, and judicial officers presiding over this Action and any persons or entities who or which excluded themselves by submitting a request for exclusion in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Notice. See “What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of The Settlement Class? How Do I Exclude Myself?” FAQ 9.
PLEASE NOTE: RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU ARE A SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER OR THAT YOU WILL BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE PROCEEDS FROM THE SETTLEMENT. THE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT A PROOF OF CLAIM FORM HAS NOW PASSED.
Back To Top -
Why Did I Get The Notice?
The Court directed that a Notice be mailed to you because you or someone in your family or an investment account for which you serve as a custodian may have purchased or otherwise acquired Eros Securities during the Settlement Class Period. The Court has directed the Claims Administrator to send you a Notice because, as a potential Settlement Class Member, you have a right to know about your options before the Court rules on the proposed Settlement. Additionally, you have the right to understand how this class action lawsuit may generally affect your legal rights. If the Court approves the Settlement and the Plan of Allocation (or some other plan of allocation), the claims administrator selected by Lead Plaintiffs and approved by the Court will make payments pursuant to the Settlement after any objections and appeals are resolved.
The purpose of the Notice is to inform you of the existence of this case, that it is a class action, how you might be affected, and how to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class if you wish to do so. It is also being sent to inform you of the terms of the proposed Settlement, and of a hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and the motion by Lead Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses (the “Settlement Hearing”). See paragraph 75 in the Notice for details about the Settlement Hearing, including the date and location of the hearing.
The issuance of the Notice is not an expression of any opinion by the Court concerning the merits of any claim in the Action, and the Court still must decide whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement and a plan of allocation, then payments to Authorized Claimants will be made after any appeals are resolved and after the completion of all claims processing. Please be patient, as this process can take some time to complete.
Back To Top -
How Are Settlement Class Members Affected by the Action and The Settlement?
As a Settlement Class Member, you are represented by Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel, unless you entered an appearance through counsel of your own choice at your own expense. You were not required to retain your own counsel, but if you chose to do so, such counsel must have filed a notice of appearance on your behalf and must have served copies of their appearance on the attorneys listed in the section entitled, “When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement?” FAQ 12.
If you are a Settlement Class Member and did not wish to remain a Settlement Class Member, you must have excluded yourself from the Settlement Class by following the instructions in the section entitled, “What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of The Settlement Class? How Do I Exclude Myself?” FAQ 9. The deadline to submit a request to be excluded from the lawsuit was November 7, 2023.
If you are a Settlement Class Member and you wished to object to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and if you did not exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must have presented your objections by following the instructions in the section entitled, “When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement?” FAQ 12.
If you are a Settlement Class Member and you did not exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you are bound by any orders issued by the Court. Because the Settlement was approved, the Court entered a judgment (the “Judgment”) dismissing with prejudice the claims against Defendants and providing that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Lead Plaintiffs and each of the other Settlement Class Members, on behalf of themselves, and their respective current and former heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, assigns, assignees, officers, directors, agents, parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, insurers, reinsurers, employees, attorneys, and Immediate Family members, in their capacities as such, will have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Plaintiffs’ Claim (as defined below) against the Defendants and the other Defendants’ Releasees (as defined below), and shall forever be barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, maintaining, or prosecuting any or all of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Defendants’ Releasees, and shall be deemed to have covenanted not to sue Defendants and the other Defendants’ Releasees on the basis of any Released Plaintiffs’ Claims.
“Released Plaintiffs’ Claims” means all claims, demands, losses, rights, liabilities, obligations, damages, issues, and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, local, statutory, common, or foreign law, or any other law, rule, or regulation, at law or in equity, whether asserted or unasserted, accrued or unaccrued, fixed or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, foreseen or unforeseen, whether matured or unmatured, whether direct, representative, class, or individual in nature that Lead Plaintiffs or any other member of the Settlement Class (i) asserted in the Complaint, or (ii) could have asserted in any forum that arise out of or are based upon, or relate in any way to, the allegations, transactions, facts, matters or occurrences, representations, or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint and that relate to the purchase, acquisition, transfer, or sale of Eros Securities during the Settlement Class Period. Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not include (i) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement, and (ii) any claims of any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court.
“Defendants’ Releasees” means Defendants and their current and former officers, directors, agents, parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, predecessors, assigns, assignees, employees, insurers, attorneys, Immediate Family members (for the Individual Defendants), and any trust of which any Individual Defendant is the settlor or which is for the benefit of any Individual Defendant and/or member(s) of his or her Immediate Family, all in their capacities as such. Defendants’ Releasees also include defendant Deshpande and STX Entertainment (f/k/a ErosSTX Global Corporation).
“Unknown Claims” means any Released Plaintiffs’ Claims which any Lead Plaintiff or any other Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, and any Released Defendants’ Claims which any Defendant or any other Defendants’ Releasee does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, which, if known by him, her, or it, might have affected his, her, or its decision(s) with respect to this Settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the other Settlement Class Members and each of the other Defendants’ Releasees shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment or the Alternate Judgment, if applicable, shall have expressly waived, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to California Civil Code §1542, which provides:
A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.
Lead Plaintiffs, Defendants, Settlement Class Members, and their respective Releasees acknowledge that they may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which they or their counsel now know or believe to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but the Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiffs and each Defendant shall have, and each Releasee by operation of the Judgment, or the Alternative Judgment, if applicable, shall be deemed to have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or Unknown Claims, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not hidden or concealed, which now exist, or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants acknowledge, and each of the other Releasees shall be deemed by operation of law to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver, and specifically the inclusion of “Unknown Claims” in the definition of Released Plaintiffs’ Claims and Released Defendants’ Claims, was separately bargained for and a key element of the Settlement.
The Judgment also provided that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Defendants and each of the other Defendants’ Releasees, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, in their capacities as such, have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Defendants’ Claim (as defined below) against Lead Plaintiffs and the other Plaintiffs’ Releasees (as defined below), and shall forever be barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, maintaining, or prosecuting any or all of the Released Defendants’ Claims against any of the Plaintiffs’ Releasees, and shall be deemed to have covenanted not to sue Lead Plaintiffs and the other Plaintiffs’ Releasees on the basis of any Released Defendants’ Claim.
“Released Defendants’ Claims” means all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, common, or foreign law, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the claims against the Defendants and Jyoti Deshpande. Released Defendants’ Claims do not include any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement or any claims against any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court. Released Defendants’ Claims do not include (i) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement, and (ii) any claims of any person or entity who or which submitted a request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court.
“Plaintiffs’ Releasees” means Lead Plaintiffs, all other plaintiffs in the Action, and any other Settlement Class Member, and their respective current and former officers, directors, agents, parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, predecessors, assigns, assignees, employees, insurers, attorneys, and Immediate Family members, all in their capacities as such.
Back To Top -
How Do I Participate in The Settlement?
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND, YOU MUST HAVE TIMELY SUBMITTED A PROOF OF CLAIM. The deadline to submit a proof of Claim form has now passed. As of August 5, 2024, we are no longer accepting new claim filings. Any new claim filings after August 5th will be rejected without further notice. Unless the Court orders otherwise, if you have not timely submitted a valid Proof of Claim, you are barred from receiving any payments from the Net Settlement Fund, but will in all other respects be bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and the Judgment.
Back To Top -
How Much Will My Payment Be?
At this time, it is not possible to make any determination as to how much any individual Settlement Class Member may receive from the Settlement. Pursuant to the Settlement, Defendants have agreed to pay or cause to be paid twenty five million dollars ($25,000,000) in cash. The Settlement Amount will be deposited into an escrow account. The Settlement Amount plus any interest earned thereon is referred to as the “Settlement Fund.” Because the Settlement was approved by the Court and the Effective Date occurred, the “Net Settlement Fund” (that is, the Settlement Fund less (a) all federal, state and/or local taxes on any income earned by the Settlement Fund and the reasonable costs incurred in connection with determining the amount of and paying taxes owed by the Settlement Fund (including reasonable expenses of tax attorneys and accountants); (b) the costs and expenses incurred in connection with providing notice to Settlement Class Members and administering the Settlement on behalf of Settlement Class Members; and (c) any attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses awarded by the Court) will be distributed to Settlement Class Members who submitted valid Claim Forms, in accordance with the Plan of Allocation approved by the court on November 28, 2023.
Neither Defendants nor any other person or entity that paid any portion of the Settlement Amount on their behalf are entitled to get back any portion of the Settlement Fund once the Court’s order or judgment approving the Settlement becomes Final. Defendants shall not have any liability, obligation, or responsibility for the administration of the Settlement, the disbursement of the Net Settlement Fund or the plan of allocation.
Approval of the Settlement is independent from approval of a plan of allocation. Any determination with respect to a plan of allocation will not affect the Settlement, if approved.
The deadline to submit a proof of Claim form has now passed. Unless the Court orders otherwise, if you have not timely submitted a valid Proof of Claim, you are barred from receiving any payments from the Net Settlement Fund, but will in all other respects be bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and the Judgment. This means that each Settlement Class Member releases the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims (as defined above) against the Defendants’ Releasees (as defined above) and will be enjoined and prohibited from filing, prosecuting, or pursuing any of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Defendants’ Releasees whether or not such Settlement Class Member submits a Claim Form.
Participants in and beneficiaries of a plan covered by ERISA (“ERISA Plan”) should NOT include any information relating to their transactions in Eros Securities held through the ERISA Plan in any Claim Form that they may submit in this Action. They should include ONLY those Eros Securities that they purchased or acquired outside of the ERISA Plan. Claims based on any ERISA Plan’s purchases or acquisitions of Eros Securities during the Settlement Class Period may be made by the plan’s trustees. To the extent any of the Defendants or any of the other persons or entities excluded from the Settlement Class are participants in the ERISA Plan, such persons or entities shall not receive, either directly or indirectly, any portion of the recovery that may be obtained from the Settlement by the ERISA Plan.
The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow, or adjust on equitable grounds the Claim of any Settlement Class Member.
Each Claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to his, her, or its Claim Form.
Only Settlement Class Members, i.e., persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Eros Securities during the Settlement Class Period and were damaged as a result of such purchases or acquisitions, will be eligible to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund. Persons and entities that are excluded from the Settlement Class by definition or that excluded themselves from the Settlement Class pursuant to request will not be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund and should not submit Claim Forms. The only securities that are included in the Settlement are the Eros Securities.
Back To Top -
What Payment Are the Attorneys For The Settlement Class Seeking? How Will the Lawyers Be Paid?
Before final approval of the Settlement, Plaintiffs’ Counsel did not receive any payment for their services in pursuing claims against the Defendants on behalf of the Settlement Class, nor was Plaintiffs’ Counsel reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses.
At the Settlement Hearing, the Court granted Lead Counsel’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees for all Plaintiffs’ Counsel in an amount not to exceed 33 1/3% of the Settlement Fund, including interest earned at the same rate as the Settlement Fund. The Court also granted Lead Counsel’s request for reimbursement of Litigation Expenses in an amount not to exceed $245,000, including reimbursement of the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Lead Plaintiffs directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class. These awarded amounts will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Settlement Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses.
Back To Top -
What If I Do Not Want to Be A Member Of The Settlement Class? How Do I Exclude Myself?
The deadline to submit a request to be excluded from the lawsuit was November 7, 2023.
Back To Top -
If I exclude myself, can I still get payment from the Settlement?
No. If you excluded yourself, you are not eligible to receive any payment out of the Net Settlement Fund.
Back To Top -
Do I have a lawyer in this case?
Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class are represented by Kara M. Wolke, Esq., of Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, CA, 90067; telephone: 1-310-201-9150; email: settlements@glancylaw.com.
Back To Top -
When and Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Settlement?
The Settlement Hearing was held on Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., before the Honorable Esther Salas at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom MLK 5A, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, NJ 07101. At the Settlement Hearing, the Court approved the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and granted Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses. After the Settlement Hearing, the Court entered the Judgment Approving the Class Action Settlement, Order Approving the Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund, and the Order Awarding Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses.
Back To Top -
Do I Have to Come To The Hearing?
The Settlement Hearing was held on November 28, 2023. You did not have to come to the hearing.
Back To Top -
May I Speak at The Hearing If I Don’t Like The Settlement?
The Settlement Hearing was held on November 28, 2023.
Back To Top -
What If I Bought Shares On Someone Else’s Behalf?
If you purchased or otherwise acquired Eros Securities between July 28, 2017 and August 3, 2021, inclusive, for the beneficial interest of persons or organizations other than yourself, you must have either (a) within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the Notice, requested from the Claims Administrator sufficient copies of the Notice and Claim Form (the “Notice Packet”) to forward to all such beneficial owners and within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of those Notice Packets, forwarded them to all such beneficial owners; or (b) within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the Notice, provided a list of the names and addresses of all such beneficial owners to In re Eros International Plc Securities Litigation, c/o Epiq, P.O. Box 2320, Portland. OR. 97208-2320. If you chose the second option, the Claims Administrator would send a copy of the Notice Packet to the beneficial owners. Upon full compliance with these directions, such nominees could seek reimbursement of their reasonable expenses actually incurred—up to a maximum of $0.15 per Notice Packet mailed, plus postage at the rate used by the Claims Administrator; $0.05 per Notice Packet transmitted by email; or $0.10 per name, mailing address, and email address (to the extent available) provided to the Claims Administrator—by providing the Claims Administrator with proper documentation supporting the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. Any dispute concerning the reasonableness of reimbursement costs shall be resolved by the Court. Copies of the Notice and the Claim Form may also be obtained from the Important Documents page of this website or by calling the Claims Administrator at 1-855-619-1409 (Toll-Free).
Back To Top -
Can I See the Court File? Whom Should I Contact If I Have Questions?
These FAQs and the Notice contain only a summary of the terms of the proposed Settlement. For more detailed information about the matters involved in this Action, you are referred to the papers on file in the Action, including the Stipulation, which may be inspected during regular office hours at the Office of the Clerk, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, NJ 07101. Additionally, copies of the Stipulation and any related orders entered by the Court will be posted on the Important Documents page of this website.
All inquiries concerning the Notice and the Claim Form should be directed to:
In re Eros International Plc Securities Litigation
c/o Epiq
P.O. Box 2320
Portland, OR 97208-2320
info@ErosSecuritiesLitigation.comand/or Kara M. Wolke, Esq.
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
1925 Century Park East
Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
1-888-773-9224
settlements@glancylaw.comDO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT, THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT, DEFENDANTS, OR THEIR COUNSEL REGARDING THIS WEBSITE.
Back To Top